Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
15 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Levine |
1 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cody Ding |
19 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Per Bech |
18 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Stochl |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
18 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
8 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cody Ding |
20 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Per Bech |
14 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Stochl |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
13 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Per Bech |
2 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Stochl |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
24 Apr 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Jun 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-12-74 |
You can find further information about peer review here.