Peer Review reports
From: Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Sep 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Maher |
17 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jørgen Hilden |
30 Oct 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shriprakash Kalantri |
5 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Penny Whiting |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
11 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shriprakash Kalantri |
12 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jørgen Hilden |
4 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Penny Whiting |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
4 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Penny Whiting |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Penny Whiting |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
6 Mar 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Mar 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-6-9 |
You can find further information about peer review here.