Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Patten |
10 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harvey Whiteford |
12 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
12 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
19 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harvey Whiteford |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
11 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
25 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
25 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
26 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Alan Wade |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
26 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
26 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
26 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-11-93 |
You can find further information about peer review here.