Peer Review reports
From: How women manage recurrent urinary tract infections: an analysis of postings on a popular web forum
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Jun 2014 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
9 Jul 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Natalie Armstrong |
11 Jul 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sheila Greenfield |
4 Aug 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Flower |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
4 Aug 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
13 Aug 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Flower |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
13 Aug 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 Aug 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Flower |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Aug 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
5 Sep 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
26 Sep 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-15-162 |
You can find further information about peer review here.