Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sonia Resik |
9 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean Handy |
15 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Xiao-Ping Dong |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
15 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
19 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sonia Resik |
22 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Xiao-Ping Dong |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
22 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
12 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean Handy |
21 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Xiao-Ping Dong |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
1 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Xiao-Ping Dong |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
1 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
5 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Xiao-Ping Dong |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
5 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
17 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Xiao-Ping Dong |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
17 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
18 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-10-178 |
You can find further information about peer review here.