Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sara Allin |
25 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Laura Guadalupe Danese-dlSantos |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
25 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Raisa Deber |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
13 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Laura Guadalupe Danese-dlSantos |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
13 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
18 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sara Allin |
11 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Raisa Deber |
13 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Laura Guadalupe Danese-dlSantos |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
13 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
29 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Laura Guadalupe Danese-dlSantos |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
29 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
17 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Laura Guadalupe Danese-dlSantos |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
17 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
2 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Laura Guadalupe Danese-dlSantos |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
2 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
7 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-771 |
You can find further information about peer review here.