Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Dec 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 Dec 2004 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Aveyard |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Dec 2004 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
5 Mar 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Lancaster |
4 Apr 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laurence Moore |
8 May 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Aveyard |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 May 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
17 May 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Aveyard |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
17 May 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
6 Jun 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laurence Moore |
13 Jun 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Lancaster |
7 Jul 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Aveyard |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
7 Jul 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
22 Jul 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Aveyard |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
22 Jul 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
29 Jul 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Jul 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-5-80 |
You can find further information about peer review here.