Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 May 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Jun 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - james jakub |
10 Jul 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - jean jacques tuech |
25 Jul 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sanjay Popat |
28 Jul 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Markus Buchler |
8 Aug 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ronan Cahill |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Aug 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sanjay Popat |
14 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Markus Buchler |
10 Sep 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ronan Cahill |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
11 Sep 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ronan Cahill |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
18 Sep 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ronan Cahill |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
18 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
23 Sep 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ronan Cahill |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
23 Sep 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
24 Sep 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Sep 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2482-8-17 |
You can find further information about peer review here.