Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
27 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
26 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Epstein |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
26 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
14 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Epstein |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
14 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
5 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Epstein |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
5 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
20 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Epstein |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
20 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
28 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Epstein |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
28 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 11 |
Publishing | ||
2 Oct 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Oct 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6939-13-26 |
You can find further information about peer review here.