Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Marschall |
18 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marion Danis |
28 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Benedicte Carlsen |
2 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Perneger |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
9 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Marschall |
10 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Benedicte Carlsen |
4 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marion Danis |
23 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Perneger |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Perneger |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
6 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
7 Dec 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Dec 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-331 |
You can find further information about peer review here.