Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
19 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
23 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Verbakel |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
23 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
28 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Verbakel |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maeve O'Beirne |
3 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carl de Wet |
19 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jason Etchegaray |
2 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Verbakel |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
19 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carl de Wet |
11 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maeve O'Beirne |
1 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Verbakel |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
26 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Verbakel |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
26 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
12 Sep 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
17 Sep 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-354 |
You can find further information about peer review here.