Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
28 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Loeb |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
11 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Heath Kelly |
11 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Walter Emil Philipp Beyer |
14 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nancy Cox |
23 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Loeb |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Heath Kelly |
15 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Walter Emil Philipp Beyer |
14 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Loeb |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
21 May 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
25 Jun 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-153 |
You can find further information about peer review here.