Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
27 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Clark |
3 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carmine Pariante |
6 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Urs Nater |
2 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Maes |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
2 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
16 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Urs Nater |
18 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carmine Pariante |
25 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Maes |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
3 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Maes |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
3 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
8 Mar 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
8 Mar 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-64 |
You can find further information about peer review here.