Skip to main content
Download PDF

The global pattern of epiphytic liverwort disparity: insights from Frullania

BMC Ecology and Evolution volume 24, Article number: 63 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

The geographical and ecological patterns of morphological disparity are crucial to understand how species are assembled within communities in the context of the evolutionary history, morphological evolution and ecological interactions. However, with limited exceptions, rather few studies have been conducted on the global pattern of disparity, particularly in early land plants. Here we explored the spatial accumulation of disparity in a morphologically variable and species rich liverwort genus Frullania in order to test the hypothesis of latitude disparity gradient. We compiled a morphological data set consisting of eight continuous traits for 244 currently accepted species, and scored the species distribution into 19 floristic regions worldwide. By reconstructing the morphospace of all defined regions and comparisons, we identified a general Gondwana-Laurasia pattern of disparity in Frullania. This likely results from an increase of ecological opportunities and / or relaxed constraints towards low latitudes. The lowest disparity occurred in arid tropical regions, largely due to a high extinction rate as a consequence of paleoaridification. There was weak correlation between species diversity and disparity at different spatial scales. Furthermore, long-distance dispersal may have partially shaped the present-day distribution of Frullania disparity, given its frequency and the great contribution of widely distributed species to local morphospace. This study not only highlighted the crucial roles of paleoenvironmental changes, ecological opportunities, and efficient dispersal on the global pattern of plant disparity, but also implied its dependence on the ecological and physiological function of traits.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The geographical and ecological patterns of morphological disparity are crucial to understand how species are assembled within communities in the context of evolutionary history, morphological evolution and ecological interactions, and to provide useful guidance for conservation purposes [1,2,3,4]. However, most geographical studies so far have biased towards the spatial patterns of species and ecological diversity [5,6,7,8,9,10] rather than towards disparity, i.e. the measure of morphological variation among species and higher taxa [11]. Thus, with a few exceptions for plants [12,13,14,15,16,17], we still do not have a good understanding of how morphological disparity accumulates along general environmental and latitudinal gradients, and what explains these patterns, particularly in land plants [2].

The latitudinal diversity gradient, i.e. increasing species diversity towards the tropics (LDG), is one of the most well-studied and recognized patterns in geography and ecology [5, 6, 8]. This pattern has been widely explored in land plant diversity [10, 18,19,20,21], and numerous hypotheses have been proposed to explain it, such as the dynamics of water-energy, habitat heterogeneity, and paleoenvironmental changes [22,23,24,25]. However, the generality of this geographical pattern in land plant disparity remains controversial [12, 14, 15]. Chartier et al. [12] has identified a latitudinal gradient in flower disparity, reflecting the release of biotic constraints and increase in plant-pollinator interactions towards low latitudes. However, this pattern was not supported in pollen disparity, largely due to phylogenetic conservation and/or adaptive evolution [15, 26]. Such inconsistency is in line with the expectations from recent studies [16, 17, 27,28,29], which have concluded that the recovered spatial trends of phenotypic disparity were not only affected by the complex of selective abiotic constraints, biotic interactions, and niche partitioning, but also depend on the ecological or physiological function of the traits studied. Currently, there is still insufficient evidence to draw conclusions, since such test was restricted to a few plant lineages and reproductive traits, e.g., pollen and flower traits [12, 15]. Thus, our knowledge of the latitudinal pattern of morphological disparity and relevant processes in plants is still poor, particularly in early land plants [2].

In this study we tested the “latitudinal disparity gradient pattern” (LDGP) in liverworts (Marchantiophyta) based on the insights from an epiphytic genus Frullania Raddi (Frullaniaceae, Porellales). Frullania, with ca. 350 species and a mainly tropical/subtropical distribution, represents one of the most species-rich leafy genera in liverworts [30,31,32]. These species are well defined by being dull green to brownish black plants, incubous leaves, a usually helmet-like leaf lobule and Frullania-type branching [33]. Apart from these taxonomic traits, this genus exhibits a rich diversity in morphology, particularly those related to plant and leaf size, such as stem width, and lobe and lobule size [33, 34]. Recent phylogenetic-based studies have greatly improved our understanding of the evolutionary history, taxonomy, ecology and geography of this genus [20, 35,36,37,38]. These new insights include: (1) Frullania was estimated to have originated in the lower Cretaceous (123 Ma) [37, 38], and experienced a burst of diversification since the Mesozoic, coinciding with the rise of forests dominated by angiosperms [35]. (2) Rampant homoplasy and rapid diversification are partly responsible for the extensive conflicts between the morphological and molecular phylogenies [30]. (3) Efficient dispersal does not obscure the pattern of a latitudinal gradient of epiphytic liverwort diversity [20, 36, 39, 40], considered as a result of ecological opportunity and climate change [20, 35].

Based on this previous work, we developed some hypotheses concerning the spatial evolution of Frullania disparity. Firstly, the tropics (excluding arid areas because of ecological stress and massive extinction, [7]) are expected to exhibit higher disparity than temperate regions. This is because of an increase of ecological opportunities and/or relaxation of ecological constraints, as well as the greater complexity of biotic interactions towards low latitudes [27, 35, 41]. Secondly, at a global scale, the correlation between species diversity and morphological disparity may be weak, given the difference in the evolutionary processes of both aspects in this group [42, 43]. Thirdly, efficient dispersion, particularly long-distance dispersal (LDD), is expected to have shaped the spatial pattern of disparity; for example, novel innovations will rapidly colonize new habitats following efficient dispersal. However, such effects may vary between terrestrial areas and islands, considering geographical isolation and dispersal limitations [44,45,46].

To test these hypotheses, we compiled a morphological dataset comprising of 244 currently accepted species and eight continuous traits. Using this dataset, we reconstructed the multi-dimensional morphospace of 19 defined geographical regions worldwide. In addition, we performed correlation analyses and measured the proportion of regional morphospace occupied by endemics in order to assess the effect of species diversity and LDD on the global pattern of morphological disparity.

Materials and Methods

Sampling and morphological trait data

The sampling includes 244 species (here we treated varieties and subspecies as species, [32], https://www.tropicos.org/home), covering ca. 70% of species diversity in Frullania (Table S1). These species were assembled to represent not only the taxonomic diversity [30, 32, 38], but also possible morphological and geographical variation observed in this genus [34, 47].

As the sporophyte data are inaccessible for most of species in this genus, we selected eight functionally significant and continuous gametophytic characters (Table S1), namely stem size (trait 1), lobe length and width (traits 2 and 3), lobule length and width (traits 4 and 5), under-leaf length and width (traits 6 and 7), and the ratio of lobule to lobe size (trait 8). The selected traits are involved in some key functions, such as water uptake and storage, and photosynthesis, that are crucial for taxa to survive and colonize in epiphytic habitats [48]. The values of eight selected traits were collected from taxonomical literature by estimating the middle of the maximum and minimum values.

Geographical data

The distribution range of each species was obtained from the database of Winter [47] and our own observations on herbarium specimens (Table S1). We scored species distribution using the biogeographical scheme defined by van der Wijk et al. [49] and Tan & Pócs [50], with a few modifications to accommodate the biographical patterns observed in Frullania. In this scheme, 19 floristic regions were recognized (Fig. S1): Europe (EUR), northern Africa (AF1), continental sub-Saharan Africa (AF2), Mascarene Islands (AF3), southern Africa (AF4), northern Asia (AS1), eastern Asia (AS2), southern Asia (AS3), south-western Asia (AS4), western Asia (AS5), North America (AM1), Central America (AM2), Caribbean islands (AM3), northern South America (AM4), Brazil (AM5), southern South America (AM6), Australia (AU1), New Zealand (AU2), and Oceania (OC). This scheme has been widely used in recent geographical studied to describe the distribution of bryophytes [51, 52].

Morphological disparity

The morphological data were log-transformed and then applied into the principal component analysis (PCA). The first five axes from the PCA, accounting for 95.84% of the total variance (Table S2), were extracted, and used to reconstructed 5-Dimension morphospace for the 19 defined geographical regions. All analyses were performed in SPSS (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).

Morphological disparity for taxa in different floristic regions was estimated using the sum of maximum distance (MD). This index was calculated as the maximum uncorrected distance between species pairs using each component in a 5-D morphospace [e.g., MDPC1 = Max (PC1taxonA-PC1taxonB)]. Because five components scale differently in the available morphospace with respect to the evolutionary history, development processes and attributes of ecological niche space they aim to represent, we measured the sum of MD for each defined region using all five PC scores, e.g., MDAS1 = ∑MDPCi (AS1).

The effects of species diversity and LDD

To test the relationship between morphological disparity and species diversity at different spatial scales, we performed Spearman correlations, taking the results of our pre-analyses into account. In these pre-analyses, both biodiversity aspects (species richness and morphological disparity) were logarithmically correlated. In addition, to reduce the effect of LDD, we performed an additional correlation analysis using a pruned sampling comprising of only endemics (referring to species exclusively occurring in one defined region).

Recent studies of population genetic structure suggested that the distance for efficient dispersal of bryophytes ranged from 100 m to 1 km, beyond which an increasingly small proportion of spores traveled [46]. However, it is still unfeasible to measure the frequency of LDD for a given bryophyte species in practice, as the present-day wide distribution could result from repeated efficient short-distance dispersal or several LDD events. Here we assumed that LDD more likely occurred for intercontinental distributed species, while less likely for endemics. To test this, we measured the proportion of local morphospace occupied by endemics. This index is expected to reflect the relative contributions from endemics and widely distributed species (referring species distributed two or more defined regions) to the whole regional morphospace. The higher the proportion is, the more contribution endemics have made, and the less effect LDD has imposed on the spatial accumulation of disparity.

Results

By reconstructing 5-D morphospace for 19 geographical regions worldwide and comparing them, we identified a general Gondwana-Laurasia pattern of disparity distribution in Frullania (Fig. 1, Fig. S1, S2). In it, Gondwanan regions show relatively higher disparity than Laurasian regions, except for east Asia (AS2), which is part of Laurasia but exhibits a similar level of disparity to most of Gondwana’s (MDAS2 = 22.08, Fig. 1). The highest disparity occurs in Central and South America (AM2, AM4, and AM6, all with a MD > 25, Fig. 1, Fig. S1, S2), while a relatively lower disparity occurs in arid tropical areas, including west Asia (AS5) and North Africa (AF1) with a MD < 10 (Fig. 1, Fig. S1, S2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pattern of Frullania disparity (the morphospace reconstructed by the first two PC components) and proportion of local morphospace occupied by endemic species (bars) in each of 19 world biogeographic regions defined by van der Wijk et al. [49] and Tan & Pócs [50]. a. The geographical scheme used in this study includes 19 regions: Europe (EUR), northern Africa (AF1), continental sub-Saharan Africa (AF2), Mascarene Islands (AF3), continental southern Africa (AF4), northern Asia (AS1), eastern Asia (AS2), southern Asia (AS3), southwestern Asia (AS4), western Asia (AS5), eastern North America (AM1), Central America (AM2), Caribbean islands (AM3), northern South America (AM4), Brazil (AM5), southern South America (AM6), Australia (AU1), New Zealand (AU2), and Oceania (OC). b. The regional morphospace reconstructed by the first two components PC1 and PC2. Both PC scores account for 81.97% of the total variance. Symbols represent 244 taxa in each graph. The dots in each figure were graphed using (x, y) with x corresponding to PC1 and y to PC2 scores. Black dots, species occurring in the highlighted geographical region; grey dots, all remaining sampled species. c. Morphological disparity and species diversity (endemic diversity in parentheses) in each 19 world geographical regions. Blue bars: the sum of the maximum distance using the first five PC scores and the original sampling. Yellow bars: the sum of the maximum distance using the first five PC scores and the pruned sampling with inclusion of exclusively endemics

Full size image

There is a significant correlation between species diversity and disparity using the original sampling (Spearman correlation r = 0.751, p < 0.001), but no a correlation using the pruned sampling (including only endemics, r = -0.286, p = 0.456). A survey of geographical distributions discovered that almost 50% of the samples (125 of 244 species) were distributed across two or more geographical regions, and among them, ca. 40% (50 of 125 species) had inter-continental distributions (Table S1, Fig. S3). At the regional scale, more than 53% of the local diversity are widely distributed species. Among all defined regions, endemics account for 0% to 85% of the regional morphospace (Fig. 1). Notably, the proportion is much higher in islands (> 70%, e.g., AU1, AU2, OC and AS4, Fig. 1) than in the mainland regions (< 60%, Fig. 1).

Discussion

The recovered geographical pattern of morphological disparity in the liverwort genus Frullania is partly consistent with the LDGP hypothesis, which predicts an increase of disparity towards low latitudes. Such pattern also highlights the variability of morphological disparity across tropical regions, that is, both the highest and lowest disparity occurring in tropics (Fig. 1). One possibility for this complex pattern is ecological opportunity or ecological constraints. In this case, the evolution of selected traits is expected to be influenced by some climatic factors that are related to water-availability [53, 54], concerning their ecological functions, e.g., uptake of water and mineral nutrition from the surrounding air [48, 55]. Therefore, the higher disparity of epiphytic liverworts at low latitudes may be related with an increase of ecological opportunities provided by tropic and subtropic forests, e.g., rich diversity of vascular plants as epiphytic substrates and extensive resources [41, 56], and / or the relaxed ecological constraints, e.g., high humidity [34, 53], and / or phenotypic innovation that facilitate ecospace expansion [13, 57, 58]. This assumption can also be used to explain the observations in some temperate regions, e.g., East Asia, which also exhibit high diversity and disparity (Fig. 1), due to availability of novel ecological opportunities in these regions that are provided by mountains and other complex topographic characteristics, e.g., deeply dissected plateaus [59,60,61,62]. In contrast, the lowest disparity in the arid tropical area may be largely due to the higher extinction rate, caused by the massive loss of the rainforest area as a consequence of sustained aridification during the Cenozoic [7, 63].

Our correlation analyses indicated that the effect of species diversity on the spatial pattern of disparity may be limited, for two reasons. Firstly, a statistically significant correlation between diversity and disparity using the original sampling was probably biased by LDD. This is because some widely distributed species are positioned at the periphery of 5-D morphospace, leading to the regions spanned by these species tending to have a similar level of disparity in spite of the difference in species diversity, e.g., AM3-5 (Fig. 1). This view was supported by disparity estimation and additional correlation analyses, in which the local morphospace of all defined regions decreased by about 20–100%, and there is no longer a correlation between diversity and disparity using the pruned sampling.

Furthermore, rapid speciation is not always accompanied by morphological differentiation. Taking East Asia (AS3) as an example, this region harbors a great diversity of anciently and recently originated bryophytes and vascular plants, largely due to recent rapid diversification caused by historical orogenesis and the consequent environmental changes [64, 65]. This scenario was also found in Frullania, in which species tend to be close to the centre of the present-day morphospace (Fig. 1), implying recent rapid speciation but slow phenotypic differentiation. This pattern has been repeatedly recovered in the phylogenetic trees of land plants [66] and animals [67], and is usually considered as a result of evolutionary rate heterogeneity [68, 69]. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that both diversity and disparity have been shaped by the same factors, such as ecological opportunity, which in empty form (newly formed and / or opened ecospace due to evolutionary innovations) is expected to promote both diversification and differentiation [70].

LDD has long been considered as a key factor shaping the geographical assembly of bryophyte diversity [29, 44,45,46, 71, 72]. In the case of Frullania, this view is supported on the basis of species richness and disparity. Although the spatial pattern of species richness was not explored in detail in this study, a survey of species distribution indicated that nearly half of Frullania species, and more than 53% of local diversity are widely distributed (Fig. 1), suggesting an important role of LDD. Nevertheless, our understanding of how LDD affects the geographical assembly of species diversity at the global scale remains poor, because of a lack of research on the history and frequency of these LDD events. In parallel, widely distributed species accounted for 15–100% of local morphospace across 19 defined regions, implying that LDD has partly shaping the present-day global pattern of disparity. Furthermore, this proportion is much higher in continental areas than in islands (Fig. 1), suggesting geographical barriers [73, 74], dispersion limits [45, 46], and/or the reduced influence of this factor on the saturation of local morphospace, which tended to happen very early in the evolution of clades [75, 76].

Conclusion

This study not only recovered a complex distribution pattern of liverwort disparity at the global scale, i.e. it varies between Gondwana regions (mostly tropical and subtropical) and Laurasia’s (mostly temperate), combined with “tropical morphological diversity disparity”, but also highlighted the crucial roles of paleoclimate changes, ecological opportunity, and LDD. The former two factors may have been involved in defining available morphospace [61, 75, 77, 78], and LDD may accelerate morphospace occupation early in the evolution of clades. Although this work fills a gap in our understanding of the spatial evolution of morphological disparity in early land plants, there are still many questions that are needed to be addressed in future studies using a large sampling and comprehensive phylogenetic-based framework, such as: how does morphological disparity respond to paleo- or present climate and geographical changes? Is the disparity correlated with the duration of lineages or geographical regions? In addition, this work reignites people’s concern about the destruction of forest ecology caused by climate change and human activities, which leads to the reduction of ecospace of these small and vulnerable liverworts, and subsequently biodiversity loss. This ongoing reality urges researchers to accelerate the study of the geographical patterns of bryophyte biodiversity, which could provide scientific biases for the development of practical conservation strategies, with particular focus on the forest in East Asia and islands that embrace the greatest biodiversity and endemics.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Foote M. The evolution of morphological diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 1997;28:129–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oyston JW, Hughes M, Gerber S, Wills MA. Why should we investigate the morphological disparity of plant clades? Ann Bot. 2015;117(5):859–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Purvis A, Hector A. Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature. 2000;405:212–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van den Ende C, Puttick MN, Urrutia AO, Wills MA. Why should we compare morphological and molecular disparity? Methods Ecol Evol. 2023;14:2390–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown JH. Why are there so many species in the tropics? J Biogeogr. 2014;41(1):8–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaston KJ. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature. 2000;405(6783):220–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hagen O, Skeels A, Onstein RE, Jetz W, Pellissier L. Earth history events shaped the evolution of uneven biodiversity across tropical moist forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(40):e2026347118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hillebrand H. On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Am Nat. 2004;163(2):192–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mittelbach G, Schemske D, Cornell H, Allen A, Brown J, Bush M, Harrison S, Hurlbert A, Knowlton N, Lessios H, McCain C, McCune A, McDade L, McPeek M, Price T, Ricklefs R, Roy K, Sax D, Turelli M. Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: Speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecol Lett. 2007;10:315–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Usinowicz J, Chang-Yang C-H, Chen Y-Y, Clark JS, Fletcher C, Garwood NC, Hao Z, Johnstone J, Lin Y, Metz MR, Masaki T, Nakashizuka T, Sun IF, Valencia R, Wang Y, Zimmerman JK, Ives AR, Wright SJ. Temporal coexistence mechanisms contribute to the latitudinal gradient in forest diversity. Nature. 2017;550(7674):105–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hopkins MJ, Gerber S. Morphological disparity. In: Nuno de la Rosa L, Müller G, editors. Evolutionary developmental biology: a reference guide. Berlin: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chartier M, von Balthazar M, Sontag S, Löfstrand S, Palme T, Jabbour F, Sauquet H, Schönenberger J. Global patterns and a latitudinal gradient of flower disparity: perspectives from the angiosperm order Ericales. New Phytol. 2021;230(2):821–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark JW, Hetherington AJ, Morris JL, Pressel S, Duckett JG, Puttick MN, Schneider H, Kenrick P, Wellman CH, Donoghue PCJ. Evolution of phenotypic disparity in the plant kingdom. Nat Plants. 2023;9(10):1618–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jardine PE, Palazzesi L, Telleria MC, Barreda VD. Why does pollen morphology vary? Evolutionary dynamics and morphospace occupation in the largest angiosperm order (Asterales). New Phytol. 2022;234(3):1075–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mander L. The latitudinal distribution of morphological diversity among holocene angiosperm pollen grains from Eastern North America and the neotropics. Integr Comp Biol. 2018;58(6):1170–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Swenson NG, Enquist BJ. Ecological and evolutionary determinants of a key plant functional trait: wood density and its community-wide variation across latitude and elevation. Am J Bot. 2007;94(3):451–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Swenson NG, Enquist BJ, Pither J, Kerkhoff AJ, Boyle B, Weiser MD, Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Forero-Montaña J, Fyllas N, Kraft NJB, Lake JK, Moles AT, Patiño S, Phillips OL, Price CA, Reich PB, Quesada CA, Stegen JC, Valencia R, Wright IJ, Wright SJ, Andelman S, Jørgensen PM, Lacher TE Jr, Monteagudo A, Núñez-Vargas MP, Vasquez-Martínez R, Nolting KM. The biogeography and filtering of woody plant functional diversity in North and South America. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2012;21(8):798–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qian H, Ricklefs RE. A latitudinal gradient in large-scale beta diversity for vascular plants in North America. Ecol Lett. 2007;10(8):737–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Subedi CK, Rokaya MB, Münzbergová Z, Timsina B, Gurung J, Chettri N, Baniya CB, Ghimire SK, Chaudhary RPJFG. Vascular plant diversity along an elevational gradient in the Central Himalayas, western Nepal. Folia Geobot. 2020;55:127–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang J, Vanderpoorten A, Hagborg A, Goffinet B, Laenen B, Patiño J. Evidence for a latitudinal diversity gradient in liverworts and hornworts. J Biogeogr. 2017;44(3):487–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zu K, Zhang C, Chen F, Zhang Z, Ahmad S, Nabi G. Latitudinal gradients of angiosperm plant diversity and phylogenetic structure in China’s nature reserves. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2023;42:e02403.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liang J, Gamarra JGP, Picard N, Zhou M, Pijanowski B, Jacobs DF, Reich PB, Crowther TW, Nabuurs G-J, de Miguel S, Fang J, Woodall CW, Svenning J-C, Jucker T, Bastin J-F, Wiser SK, Slik F, Hérault B, Alberti G, Keppel G, Hengeveld GM, Ibisch PL, Silva CA, ter Steege H, Peri PL, Coomes DA, Searle EB, von Gadow K, Jaroszewicz B, Abbasi AO, Abegg M, Yao YCA, Aguirre-Gutiérrez J, Zambrano AMA, Altman J, Alvarez-Dávila E, Álvarez-González JG, Alves LF, Amani BHK, Amani CA, Ammer C, Ilondea BA, Antón-Fernández C, Avitabile V, Aymard GA, Azihou AF, Baard JA, Baker TR, Balazy R, Bastian ML, Batumike R, Bauters M, Beeckman H, Benu NMH, Bitariho R, Boeckx P, Bogaert J, Bongers F, Bouriaud O, Brancalion PHS, Brandl S, Brearley FQ, Briseno-Reyes J, Broadbent EN, Bruelheide H, Bulte E, Catlin AC, Cazzolla Gatti R, César RG, Chen HYH, Chisholm C, Cienciala E, Colletta GD, Corral-Rivas JJ, Cuchietti A, Cuni-Sanchez A, Dar JA, Dayanandan S, de Haulleville T, Decuyper M, Delabye S, Derroire G, DeVries B, Diisi J, Do TV, Dolezal J, Dourdain A, Durrheim GP, Obiang NLE, Ewango CEN, Eyre TJ, Fayle TM, Feunang LFN, Finér L, Fischer M, Fridman J, Frizzera L, de Gasper AL, Gianelle D, Glick HB, Gonzalez-Elizondo MS, Gorenstein L, Habonayo R, Hardy OJ, Harris DJ, Hector A, Hemp A, Herold M, Hillers A, Hubau W, Ibanez T, Imai N, Imani G, Jagodzinski AM, Janecek S, Johannsen VK, Joly CA, Jumbam B, Kabelong BLPR, Kahsay GA, Karminov V, Kartawinata K, Kassi JN, Kearsley E, Kennard DK, Kepfer-Rojas S, Khan ML, Kigomo JN, Kim HS, Klauberg C, Klomberg Y, Korjus H, Kothandaraman S, Kraxner F, Kumar A, Kuswandi R, Lang M, Lawes MJ, Leite RV, Lentner G, Lewis SL, Libalah MB, Lisingo J, López-Serrano PM, Lu H, Lukina NV, Lykke AM, Maicher V, Maitner BS, Marcon E, Marshall AR, Martin EH, Martynenko O, Mbayu FM, Mbuvi MTE, Meave JA, Merow C, Miscicki S, Moreno VS, Morera A, Mukul SA, Müller JC, Murdjoko A, Nava-Miranda MG, Ndive LE, Neldner VJ, Nevenic RV, Nforbelie LN, Ngoh ML, N’Guessan AE, Ngugi MR, Ngute ASK, Njila ENN, Nyako MC, Ochuodho TO, Oleksyn J, Paquette A, Parfenova EI, Park M, Parren M, Parthasarathy N, Pfautsch S, Phillips OL, Piedade MTF, Piotto D, Pollastrini M, Poorter L, Poulsen JR, Poulsen AD, Pretzsch H, Rodeghiero M, Rolim SG, Rovero F, Rutishauser E, Sagheb-Talebi K, Saikia P, Sainge MN, Salas-Eljatib C, Salis A, Schall P, Schepaschenko D, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schmid B, Schöngart J, Šebeň V, Sellan G, Selvi F, Serra-Diaz JM, Sheil D, Shvidenko AZ, Sist P, Souza AF, Stereńczak KJ, Sullivan MJP, Sundarapandian S, Svoboda M, Swaine MD, Targhetta N, Tchebakova N, Trethowan LA, Tropek R, Mukendi JT, Umunay PM, Usoltsev VA, Vaglio Laurin G, Valentini R, Valladares F, van der Plas F, Vega-Nieva DJ, Verbeeck H, Viana H, Vibrans AC, Vieira SA, Vleminckx J, Waite CE, Wang H-F, Wasingya EK, Wekesa C, Westerlund B, Wittmann F, Wortel V, Zawiła-Niedźwiecki T, Zhang C, Zhao X, Zhu J, Zhu X, Zhu Z-X, Zo-Bi IC, Hui C. Co-limitation towards lower latitudes shapes global forest diversity gradients. Nat Ecol Evol. 2022;6(10):1423–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sabatini FM, Jiménez-Alfaro B, Jandt U, Chytrý M, Field R, Kessler M, Lenoir J, Schrodt F, Wiser SK, Arfin Khan MAS, Attorre F, Cayuela L, De Sanctis M, Dengler J, Haider S, Hatim MZ, Indreica A, Jansen F, Pauchard A, Peet RK, Petřík P, Pillar VD, Sandel B, Schmidt M, Tang Z, van Bodegom P, Vassilev K, Violle C, Alvarez-Davila E, Davidar P, Dolezal J, Hérault B, Galán-de-Mera A, Jiménez J, Kambach S, Kepfer-Rojas S, Kreft H, Lezama F, Linares-Palomino R, Monteagudo Mendoza A, N’Dja JK, Phillips OL, Rivas-Torres G, Sklenář P, Speziale K, Strohbach BJ, Vásquez Martínez R, Wang H-F, Wesche K, Bruelheide H. Global patterns of vascular plant alpha diversity. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Saupe EE, Myers CE, Townsend Peterson A, Soberon J, Singarayer J, Valdes P, Qiao H. Spatio-temporal climate change contributes to latitudinal diversity gradients. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019;3(10):1419–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wellman CH, Berry CM, Davies NS, Lindemann FJ, Marshall JEA, Wyatt A. Low tropical diversity during the adaptive radiation of early land plants. Nat Plants. 2022;8(2):104–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mander L, Parins-Fukuchi C, Dick CW, Punyasena SW, Jaramillo C. Phylogenetic and ecological correlates of pollen morphological diversity in a Neotropical rainforest. Biotropica. 2021;53(1):74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Berdugo MB, Gradstein SR, Guérot L, León-Yánez S, Bendix J, Bader MY. Diversity patterns of epiphytic bryophytes across spatial scales: Species-rich crowns and beta-diverse trunks. Biotropica. 2022;54(4):893–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang C, Xu Y, Zang R. Variation patterns of functional trait moments along geographical gradients and their environmental determinants in the subtropical evergreen broadleaved forests. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:686965.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ledent A, Gauthier J, Pereira M, Overson R, Laenen B, Mardulyn P, Gradstein SR, de Haan M, Ballings P, Van der Beeten I, Zartman CE, Vanderpoorten A. What do tropical cryptogams reveal? Strong genetic structure in Amazonian bryophytes. New Phytol. 2020;228(2):640–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hentschel J, von Konrat MJ, Pócs T, Schäfer-Verwimp A, Jonathan Shaw A, Schneider H, Heinrichs J. Molecular insights into the phylogeny and subgeneric classification of Frullania Raddi (Frullaniaceae, Porellales). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009;52(1):142–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schuster RM. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America. East of the Hundredth Meridian, vol. 5. Chicago: Field museum of natural history; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Söderström L, Hagborg A, von Konrat M, Bartholomew-Began SE, Bell D, Briscoe LRE, Brown EA, Cargill DC, Costa DP, Crandall-Stotler BJ, Cooper ED, Dauphin G, Engel JJ, Feldberg K, Glenny D, Gradstein SR, He X, Heinrichs J, Hentschel J, Ilkiu-Borges AL, Katagiri T, Konstantinova NA, Larraín J, Long DG, Nebel M, Pócs T, Puche F, Reiner-Drehwald E, Renner MAM, Sass-Gyarmati A, Schäfer-Verwimp A, Moragues JGS, Stotler RE, Sukkharak P, Thiers BM, Uribe JJ, Váňa J, Villarreal JC, Wigginton MJ, Zhang L, Zhu RLJP. World checklist of hornworts and liverworts. PhytoKeys. 2016;59:1–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gradstein SR, Churchill SP, Salazar-Allen N. Guide to the Bryophytes of tropical America. Mem N Y Bot Gard. 2001;86:1–577.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gradstein SR, Ilkiu-Borges AL. Guide to the plants of central French Guiana. Part 4. Liverworts and hornworts. Mem N Y Bot Gard. 2009;76:1–140.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Feldberg K, Schneider H, Stadler T, Schäfer-Verwimp A, Schmidt AR, Heinrichs J. Epiphytic leafy liverworts diversified in angiosperm-dominated forests. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5974.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Laenen B, Patino J, Hagborg A, Désamoré A, Wang J, Shaw AJ, Goffinet B, Vanderpoorten A. Evolutionary origin of the latitudinal diversity gradient in liverworts. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018;127:606–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Laenen B, Shaw B, Schneider H, Goffinet B, Paradis E, Désamoré A, Heinrichs J, Villarreal JC, Gradstein SR, McDaniel SF, Long DG, Forrest LL, Hollingsworth ML, Crandall-Stotler B, Davis EC, Engel J, Von Konrat M, Cooper ED, Patiño J, Cox CJ, Vanderpoorten A, Shaw AJ. Extant diversity of bryophytes emerged from successive post-Mesozoic diversification bursts. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Silva S, Silva D, Almeida T, Garcia C, Paulo O, Sim-Sim M. Age estimates of Frullania (Frullaniaceae, Porellales) main lineages: another example of rapid and recent diversification in liverwort evolution. Syst Biol. 2016;15:156–65.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chen S-B, Ferry Slik JW, Gao J, Mao L-F, Bi M-J, Shen M-W, Zhou K-X. Latitudinal diversity gradients in bryophytes and woody plants: Roles of temperature and water availability. J Syst Evol. 2015;53(6):535–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Patiño J, Vanderpoorten A. Bryophyte biogeography. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2018;37(2–3):175–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schluter D. Speciation, ecological opportunity, and latitude. Am Nat. 2016;187(1):1–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Flores JR, Suárez GM, Hyvönen J. Reassessing the role of morphology in bryophyte phylogenetics: Combined data improves phylogenetic inference despite character conflict. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2020;143:106662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yu Y, Pócs T, Schäfer-Verwimp A, Heinrichs J, Zhu RL, Schneider H. Evidence for rampant homoplasy in the phylogeny of the epiphyllous liverwort genus Cololejeunea (Lejeuneaceae). Syst Bot. 2013;38(3):553–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Carter BE. The roles of dispersal limitation, climatic niches and glacial history in endemism of the North American bryophyte flora. Am J Bot. 2021;108(8):1555–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Frahm JP. Diversity, dispersal and biogeography of bryophytes (mosses). Biodivers Conserv. 2009;17:277–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vanderpoorten A, Patiño J, Désamoré A, Laenen B, Górski P, Papp B, Holá E, Korpelainen H, Hardy O. To what extent are bryophytes efficient dispersers? J Ecol. 2019;107(5):2149–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Winter G. Frullania species-distribution & bibliography. Frullania Newsletter. 2022;11:1–392.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Glime J. Bryophyte Ecology. ebook from https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/oabooks/4. Retrieved 26 June 2023. 2021.

  49. van der Wijk R, Margadant WD, Florschutz PA. Index Muscorum. Utrecht: International Association of Plant Taxonomists; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tan BC, Pócs T. Bryogeography and conservation of bryophytes. In: Shaw AJ, Goffinet B, editors. Bryophyte biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 403–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Laenen B, Machac A, Gradstein S, Aguero B, Patiño J, Désamoré A, Goffinet B, Cox C, Shaw A, Vanderpoorten A. Geographical range in liverworts: does sex really matter? J Biogeogr. 2016;43:627–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Vanderpoorten A, Gradstein SR, Carine MA, Devos N. The ghosts of Gondwana and Laurasia in modern liverwort distributions. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010;85(3):471–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Maul K, Wei Y-M, Nebel M, Luebert F, Ho BC, Quandt D, Kessler M. Different predictors shape the diversity patterns of epiphytic and non-epiphytic liverworts in montane forests of Uganda. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:765.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Mukhia S, Mandal P, Singh DK, Singh D. The abundance of epiphytic liverworts on the bark of Cryptomeria japonica in relation to different physical and biochemical attributes, found in Senchal Wildlife Sanctuary, Darjeeling, Eastern Himalaya. BMC Ecol. 2019;19(1):37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. He X, He KS, Hyvönen J. Will bryophytes survive in a warming world? Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2016;19:49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wiens JJ. The causes of species richness patterns across space, time, and clades and the role of “ecological limits.” Q Rev Biol. 2011;86(2):75–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Harris BJ, Clark JW, Schrempf D, Szöllősi GJ, Donoghue PCJ, Hetherington AM, Williams TA. Divergent evolutionary trajectories of bryophytes and tracheophytes from a complex common ancestor of land plants. Nat Ecol Evol. 2022;6(11):1634–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Leslie AB, Simpson C, Mander L. Reproductive innovations and pulsed rise in plant complexity. Science. 2021;373(6561):1368–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ellepola G, Pie MR, Pethiyagoda R, Hanken J, Meegaskumbura M. The role of climate and islands in species diversification and reproductive-mode evolution of old world tree frogs. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1):347.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Losos JB, Ricklefs RE. Adaptation and diversification on islands. Nature. 2009;457(7231):830–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Nürk NM, Atchison GW, Hughes CE. Island woodiness underpins accelerated disparification in plant radiations. New Phytol. 2019;224(1):518–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Weigelt P, Jetz W, Kreft H. Bioclimatic and physical characterization of the world’s islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(38):15307–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Kissling WD, Eiserhardt WL, Baker WJ, Borchsenius F, Couvreur TL, Balslev H, Svenning JC. Cenozoic imprints on the phylogenetic structure of palm species assemblages worldwide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(19):7379–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Harrison SP, Yu G, Takahara H, Prentice IC. Palaeovegetation. Diversity of temperate plants in east Asia. Nature. 2001;413(6852):129–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Xing Y, Ree RH. Uplift-driven diversification in the Hengduan Mountains, a temperate biodiversity hotspot. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(17):E3444–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Sundue MA, Testo WL, Ranker TA. Morphological innovation, ecological opportunity, and the radiation of a major vascular epiphyte lineage. Evolution. 2015;69(9):2482–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Missagia RV, Casali DM, Patterson BD, Perini FA. Decoupled patterns of diversity and disparity characterize an ecologically specialized lineage of neotropical Cricetids. Evol Biol. 2023;50(2):181–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Cooney CR, Thomas GH. Heterogeneous relationships between rates of speciation and body size evolution across vertebrate clades. Nat Ecol Evol. 2021;5(1):101–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Sauquet H, Magallón S. Key questions and challenges in angiosperm macroevolution. New Phytol. 2018;219(4):1170–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Burbrink FT, Pyron RA. How does ecological opportunity influence rates of speciation, extinction, and morphological diversification in new world ratsnakes (Tribe Lampropeltini)? Evolution. 2010;64(4):934–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Barbé M, Fenton NJ, Bergeron Y. So close and yet so far away: long-distance dispersal events govern bryophyte metacommunity reassembly. J Ecol. 2016;104(6):1707–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Ledent A, Désamoré A, Laenen B, Mardulyn P, McDaniel SF, Zanatta F, Patiño J, Vanderpoorten A. No borders during the post-glacial assembly of European bryophytes. Ecol Lett. 2019;22(6):973–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ferreira-Arruda T, Guerrero-Ramírez NR, Denelle P, Weigelt P, Kleyer M, Kreft H. Island area and historical geomorphological dynamics shape multifaceted diversity of barrier island floras. Ecography. 2022;8:e06238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Whittaker RJ, Triantis KA, Ladle RJ. A general dynamic theory of oceanic island biogeography. J Biogeogr. 2008;35(6):977–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Erwin DH. Disparity: Morphological pattern and developmnetal context. Paleontology. 2007;50(1):57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Hughes M, Gerber S, Wills MA. Clades reach highest morphological disparity early in their evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(34):13875–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Brocklehurst N, Benson RJ. Multiple paths to morphological diversification during the origin of amniotes. Nat Ecol Evol. 2021;5(9):1243–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Harmon LJ, Melville J, Larson A, Losos JB. The role of geography and ecological opportunity in the diversification of day geckos (Phelsuma). Syst Biol. 2008;57(4):562–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Innovative Center of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry at Huangshan University for assistance in data analyses.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31970227), and the grants from Anhui Provincial Department of Education (No. 2022AH051962 and 2023AH020043) and Huangshan University (No. 2022xzx007 and 2021xkjq004) to YY.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Huangshan University, Huangshan, 245041, China

    Ying Yu, Mei-Ying Fan, Hong-Xia Zhou & Yue-Qin Song

Authors
  1. Ying Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mei-Ying Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hong-Xia Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yue-Qin Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by YY, MF, HZ and YS. Data analysis was conducted by YY. The first draft of the manuscript was written by YY, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Yu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, Y., Fan, MY., Zhou, HX. et al. The global pattern of epiphytic liverwort disparity: insights from Frullania. BMC Ecol Evo 24, 63 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12862-024-02254-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12862-024-02254-x

Keywords

BMC Ecology and Evolution

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us